Why the F**k do I bother? I will not even be here to see the final destruction of my Folk. But I do.

It is foretold that within the next twenty years, or less, the indigenous peoples of the British Isles, those descendents of the Northern European Folk who have lived here since the Last Ice Age will be drastically outnumbered demographically by the Muslims who are at present welcomed at an alarming and exponentially increasing rate, welcomed into these islands by our traitorous Marxist-Liberal elite.

Like many people who watched the attempted character assassination of Nick Griffin on Question Time recently I was totally appalled by the blatant dishonesty and crass ignorance displayed by David Dimbleby and his panel of rabid attack hyenas and the baying audience of hand picked leftards and UAF supporters.

This disgusting debacle has been the subject of much discussion  since it was aired, so my intention is not to sift through the potshards generally, but I intend to air my views about that superficial woman Bonny Greer, making special reference to her pseudo-scientific ‘out of Africa’ claptrap.

She had the audacity to invite him to the British Museum for a lesson to understand once and for all that there is no such thing as "the indigenous British people".

I would like to see her try to tell me that! I am not going to bother to quibble about whether it was 17,000, 15,000, or even 10,000 years ago that the glaciers finally retreated, allowing the colonisation of Britain via the land bridge that once connected us to the continental massif which we now call mainland Europe. The fact of the matter is that during the Great Migrations, when the first hunter gatherers came to these shores, sometimes to be driven back during periods of re-glaciation, and afterwards, were all related tribes of European stock who had evolved quite separately to those of Asian and African origin.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The founding myth of liberalism is the One world, One Race, Out of Africa Theory.

Hat tip I love SA,

 

Black Africans came from European Dmanisi Hominins - modern white Europeans did not evolve from Black Africans.

It has now been demolished.

Whites and blacks evolved separately. Whites and blacks ARE different races.

You haven't heard about this. Why? Because it would destroy the liberal establishment's fabrication that we're all the same race despite mounting and compelling archaeological and DNA evidence to the contrary. The story has been kept quiet unlike the media fanfare that usually follows obscure findings that states that the races are the same.

Whites came from Africa originally yes, possibly, but what they fail to tell you is that the migration occurred far back enough - almost two million years - for the species of hominins to evolve separately hence the differences between the races. It was in fact, whites that migrated back into Africa.

There are many human races, not one.

We now have the Out of Europe Theory.
Related:

Race as a Biological Concept
March of the Titans - A History of the White Race - Chapter 1
DNA proves race differences
It’s elementary, my dear Watson…
James Watson Tells the Inconvenient Truth: Faces the Consequences
In Defense of The Splendour of Truth
Fury At DNA Pioneer's Theory: Africans Are Less Intelligent Than Westerners
The biological basis of race
From the Independent (UK)

A skull that rewrites the history of man

It has long been agreed that Africa was the sole cradle of human evolution. Then these bones were found in Georgia...

By Steve Connor, Science Editor - Wednesday, 9 September 2009

The conventional view of human evolution and how early man colonised the world has been thrown into doubt by a series of stunning paleontological discoveries suggesting that Africa was not the sole cradle of humankind. Scientists have found a handful of ancient human skulls at an archaeological site two hours from the Georgian capital, Tbilisi, that suggest a Eurasian chapter in the long evolutionary story of man.

The skulls, jawbones and fragments of limb bones suggest that our ancient human ancestors migrated out of Africa far earlier than previously thought and spent a long evolutionary interlude in Eurasia – before moving back into Africa to complete the story of man.

Experts believe fossilised bones unearthed at the medieval village of Dmanisi in the foothills of the Caucuses, and dated to about 1.8 million years ago, are the oldest indisputable remains of humans discovered outside of Africa.

But what has really excited the researchers is the discovery that these early humans (or "hominins") are far more primitive-looking than the Homo erectus humans that were, until now, believed to be the first people to migrate out of Africa about 1 million years ago.

The Dmanisi people had brains that were about 40 per cent smaller than those of Homo erectus and they were much shorter in stature than classical H. erectus skeletons, according to Professor David Lordkipanidze, general director of the Georgia National Museum. "Before our findings, the prevailing view was that humans came out of Africa almost 1 million years ago, that they already had sophisticated stone tools, and that their body anatomy was quite advanced in terms of brain capacity and limb proportions. But what we are finding is quite different," Professor Lordkipanidze said.

"The Dmanisi hominins are the earliest representatives of our own genus – Homo – outside Africa, and they represent the most primitive population of the species Homo erectus to date.
They might be ancestral to all later Homo erectus populations, which would suggest a Eurasian origin of Homo erectus."
Speaking at the British Science Festival in Guildford, where he gave the British Council lecture, Professor Lordkipanidze raised the prospect that Homo erectus may have evolved in Eurasia from the more primitive-looking Dmanisi population and then migrated back to Africa to eventually give rise to our own species, Homo sapiens – modern man.

"The question is whether Homo erectus originated in Africa or Eurasia, and if in Eurasia, did we have vice-versa migration? This idea looked very stupid a few years ago, but today it seems not so stupid," he told the festival.

The scientists have discovered a total of five skulls and a solitary jawbone. It is clear that they had relatively small brains, almost a third of the size of modern humans. "They are quite small. Their lower limbs are very human and their upper limbs are still quite archaic and they had very primitive stone tools," Professor Lordkipanidze said. "Their brain capacity is about 600 cubic centimetres. The prevailing view before this discovery was that the humans who first left Africa had a brain size of about 1,000 cubic centimetres."

The only human fossil to predate the Dmanisi specimens are of an archaic species Homo habilis, or "handy man", found only in Africa, which used simple stone tools and lived between about 2.5 million and 1.6 million years ago.

"I'd have to say, if we'd found the Dmanisi fossils 40 years ago, they would have been classified as Homo habilis because of the small brain size. Their brow ridges are not as thick as classical Homo erectus, but their teeth are more H. erectus like," Professor Lordkipanidze said. "All these finds show that the ancestors of these people were much more primitive than we thought. I don't think that we were so lucky as to have found the first travellers out of Africa.

Georgia is the cradle of the first Europeans, I would say," he told the meeting.

"What we learnt from the Dmanisi fossils is that they are quite small – between 1.44 metres to 1.5 metres tall. What is interesting is that their lower limbs, their tibia bones, are very human-like so it seems they were very good runners," he said.
He added: "In regards to the question of which came first, enlarged brain size or bipedalism, maybe indirectly this information calls us to think that body anatomy was more important than brain size. While the Dmanisi people were almost modern in their body proportions, and were highly efficient walkers and runners, their arms moved in a different way, and their brains were tiny compared to ours.

"Nevertheless, they were sophisticated tool makers with high social and cognitive skills,"
he told the science festival, which is run by the British Science Association. [ring any bells? - Ed.]

One of the five skulls is of a person who lost all his or her teeth during their lifetime but had still survived for many years despite being completely toothless. This suggests some kind of social organisation based on mutual care, Professor Lordkipanidze said.