Why the F**k do I bother? I will not even be here to see the final destruction of my Folk. But I do.

It is foretold that within the next twenty years, or less, the indigenous peoples of the British Isles, those descendents of the Northern European Folk who have lived here since the Last Ice Age will be drastically outnumbered demographically by the Muslims who are at present welcomed at an alarming and exponentially increasing rate, welcomed into these islands by our traitorous Marxist-Liberal elite.

Like many people who watched the attempted character assassination of Nick Griffin on Question Time recently I was totally appalled by the blatant dishonesty and crass ignorance displayed by David Dimbleby and his panel of rabid attack hyenas and the baying audience of hand picked leftards and UAF supporters.

This disgusting debacle has been the subject of much discussion  since it was aired, so my intention is not to sift through the potshards generally, but I intend to air my views about that superficial woman Bonny Greer, making special reference to her pseudo-scientific ‘out of Africa’ claptrap.

She had the audacity to invite him to the British Museum for a lesson to understand once and for all that there is no such thing as "the indigenous British people".

I would like to see her try to tell me that! I am not going to bother to quibble about whether it was 17,000, 15,000, or even 10,000 years ago that the glaciers finally retreated, allowing the colonisation of Britain via the land bridge that once connected us to the continental massif which we now call mainland Europe. The fact of the matter is that during the Great Migrations, when the first hunter gatherers came to these shores, sometimes to be driven back during periods of re-glaciation, and afterwards, were all related tribes of European stock who had evolved quite separately to those of Asian and African origin.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The founding myth of liberalism is the One world, One Race, Out of Africa Theory.

Hat tip I love SA,

 

Black Africans came from European Dmanisi Hominins - modern white Europeans did not evolve from Black Africans.

It has now been demolished.

Whites and blacks evolved separately. Whites and blacks ARE different races.

You haven't heard about this. Why? Because it would destroy the liberal establishment's fabrication that we're all the same race despite mounting and compelling archaeological and DNA evidence to the contrary. The story has been kept quiet unlike the media fanfare that usually follows obscure findings that states that the races are the same.

Whites came from Africa originally yes, possibly, but what they fail to tell you is that the migration occurred far back enough - almost two million years - for the species of hominins to evolve separately hence the differences between the races. It was in fact, whites that migrated back into Africa.

There are many human races, not one.

We now have the Out of Europe Theory.
Related:

Race as a Biological Concept
March of the Titans - A History of the White Race - Chapter 1
DNA proves race differences
It’s elementary, my dear Watson…
James Watson Tells the Inconvenient Truth: Faces the Consequences
In Defense of The Splendour of Truth
Fury At DNA Pioneer's Theory: Africans Are Less Intelligent Than Westerners
The biological basis of race
From the Independent (UK)

A skull that rewrites the history of man

It has long been agreed that Africa was the sole cradle of human evolution. Then these bones were found in Georgia...

By Steve Connor, Science Editor - Wednesday, 9 September 2009

The conventional view of human evolution and how early man colonised the world has been thrown into doubt by a series of stunning paleontological discoveries suggesting that Africa was not the sole cradle of humankind. Scientists have found a handful of ancient human skulls at an archaeological site two hours from the Georgian capital, Tbilisi, that suggest a Eurasian chapter in the long evolutionary story of man.

The skulls, jawbones and fragments of limb bones suggest that our ancient human ancestors migrated out of Africa far earlier than previously thought and spent a long evolutionary interlude in Eurasia – before moving back into Africa to complete the story of man.

Experts believe fossilised bones unearthed at the medieval village of Dmanisi in the foothills of the Caucuses, and dated to about 1.8 million years ago, are the oldest indisputable remains of humans discovered outside of Africa.

But what has really excited the researchers is the discovery that these early humans (or "hominins") are far more primitive-looking than the Homo erectus humans that were, until now, believed to be the first people to migrate out of Africa about 1 million years ago.

The Dmanisi people had brains that were about 40 per cent smaller than those of Homo erectus and they were much shorter in stature than classical H. erectus skeletons, according to Professor David Lordkipanidze, general director of the Georgia National Museum. "Before our findings, the prevailing view was that humans came out of Africa almost 1 million years ago, that they already had sophisticated stone tools, and that their body anatomy was quite advanced in terms of brain capacity and limb proportions. But what we are finding is quite different," Professor Lordkipanidze said.

"The Dmanisi hominins are the earliest representatives of our own genus – Homo – outside Africa, and they represent the most primitive population of the species Homo erectus to date.
They might be ancestral to all later Homo erectus populations, which would suggest a Eurasian origin of Homo erectus."
Speaking at the British Science Festival in Guildford, where he gave the British Council lecture, Professor Lordkipanidze raised the prospect that Homo erectus may have evolved in Eurasia from the more primitive-looking Dmanisi population and then migrated back to Africa to eventually give rise to our own species, Homo sapiens – modern man.

"The question is whether Homo erectus originated in Africa or Eurasia, and if in Eurasia, did we have vice-versa migration? This idea looked very stupid a few years ago, but today it seems not so stupid," he told the festival.

The scientists have discovered a total of five skulls and a solitary jawbone. It is clear that they had relatively small brains, almost a third of the size of modern humans. "They are quite small. Their lower limbs are very human and their upper limbs are still quite archaic and they had very primitive stone tools," Professor Lordkipanidze said. "Their brain capacity is about 600 cubic centimetres. The prevailing view before this discovery was that the humans who first left Africa had a brain size of about 1,000 cubic centimetres."

The only human fossil to predate the Dmanisi specimens are of an archaic species Homo habilis, or "handy man", found only in Africa, which used simple stone tools and lived between about 2.5 million and 1.6 million years ago.

"I'd have to say, if we'd found the Dmanisi fossils 40 years ago, they would have been classified as Homo habilis because of the small brain size. Their brow ridges are not as thick as classical Homo erectus, but their teeth are more H. erectus like," Professor Lordkipanidze said. "All these finds show that the ancestors of these people were much more primitive than we thought. I don't think that we were so lucky as to have found the first travellers out of Africa.

Georgia is the cradle of the first Europeans, I would say," he told the meeting.

"What we learnt from the Dmanisi fossils is that they are quite small – between 1.44 metres to 1.5 metres tall. What is interesting is that their lower limbs, their tibia bones, are very human-like so it seems they were very good runners," he said.
He added: "In regards to the question of which came first, enlarged brain size or bipedalism, maybe indirectly this information calls us to think that body anatomy was more important than brain size. While the Dmanisi people were almost modern in their body proportions, and were highly efficient walkers and runners, their arms moved in a different way, and their brains were tiny compared to ours.

"Nevertheless, they were sophisticated tool makers with high social and cognitive skills,"
he told the science festival, which is run by the British Science Association. [ring any bells? - Ed.]

One of the five skulls is of a person who lost all his or her teeth during their lifetime but had still survived for many years despite being completely toothless. This suggests some kind of social organisation based on mutual care, Professor Lordkipanidze said.

Another glimpse through the looking glass?

Has the truth finally come out? 

Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser

Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a “truly multicultural” country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".

As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

Critics said the revelations showed a "conspiracy" within Government to impose mass immigration for "cynical" political reasons.

Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.

Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the "major shift" in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

(...)

---

“ I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the
   policy was intended – even if this wasn't its main purpose – to rub the Right's
   nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date. ”

---

(...)

Full Story

I don’t believe so ....

While the apparatchiks would doubtless have experienced much glee at the opportunity to “rub the Right's nose in diversity” it is certainly not the reason that this particular subversive and treasonous act was committed. This revelation is a controlled leak, a cynical attempt to justify what they have done and what they are still doing and possibly to inflame tensions. A multi-cultural society was never the goal of New Labour, it was simply a phase in a project, a project in which a major milestone is the creation of a supra-national government, namely the European Union.

The British would never willingly succumb to supra-national government because our people have a strong and entirely natural sense of belonging that binds us to this place, our land, our culture and our people.

Our ancestors fought valiantly and successfully when exercising their inalienable personal right to protect their own way of life, their own values, their own beliefs and their own people. They exercised their inalienable right to fight for what belonged to them; the land that sustained them from birth and to which they were returned in death, the culture that enabled and protected them, and the people that they loved. They fought to protect their personal sovereignty and, in times of need, came together to protect their national sovereignty and with it their inalienable right to self-determination as a people in their own land.

It was in such times, when our ancestors fought against the successive waves of forces that sought to strip them of their inalienable ancient rights and liberties, that the social bonds, the personal relationships which bind our society together, were strengthened.

We, the descendants of the millions who fought and the millions who lost their lives in the process, still retain those inalienable rights to fight for what we love, the things that make us who we are, the preservation our natural place in this world ....our home, our tiny island, a land that belongs to us just as much we belong to it. It is our social bonds, passed down thought generations, reinforced in numerous times of hardship and conflict, that are the reason we still exist and that give us the strength to continue to fight.

Which brings me onto the real reason for mass immigration ....

The Destruction of Social Bonds

Our people became the target of those, both foreign and domestic, who strive for the destruction of our sovereignty in support of a foreign supra-national government that falls under the direct control of an unelected and undemocratic oligarchy. This process is highly unlawful by our own constitution ....

“ And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath
   or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority,
   ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. ”

English Bill of Rights - 1689

The government of the European Union is a government of treason and corruption and the powers that it possesses are unlawful ....yet it exists. It exists because it was created by acts of treason, but it continues to exist because it is sustained and strengthened by acts of subversion, some of which have served to deliberately weaken the social bonds that gave our people the strength and courage to stand together, to fight against oppression, to fight against the theft of our inalienable rights and liberties, to fight against the darkness.

Mass immigration was and still is just one of many subversive acts.

In order to reach this phase of the European Project they needed to weaken opposition amongst sovereign peoples, to bring that opposition within manageable levels and to achieve this they attacked the very foundations of our society, the social bonds themselves, and with them the sense of belonging they helped to reinforce.

One of the methods chosen to weaken our people was that of Population Transfer.

Communist mass-murder and all-round fruitcake Joseph Stalin, considered a hero in the Communist Party from which many of today’s high ranking Labour officials and trade union leaders originated, came up with a solution to destroy those pesky social bonds. That solution was Population Transfer.

In the glorious days of the Soviet Union, where the need arose to rid the state of those classified as “anti-Soviet” or “enemies of the workers” (people who took offence to being invaded, turned into slaves or murdered), there were numerous methods of achieving population transfer including, most notably, mass-murder. But mass-murder is generally frowned upon nowadays ....unless you are an African dictator that chooses to murder white farmers, their wives and children in which case knowledge of your particular crime against humanity is quietly brushed under the carpet as your own people starve.

Another method of achieving population transfer was the highly successful “labor force transfer”, clearing entire territories of the original inhabitants, followed by organised inward migrations to fill these ethnically cleansed territories. The resultant destruction of social bonds would have massively weakened the willingness of the people to work together and fight against the oppressive totalitarian regime.

The policy of population transfer remains one of Stalin’s legacies, a policy that the Labour Party and it’s partners in the socialist dominated European Union have been more than willing to adopt, albeit subversively. Of course, they don’t refer to this process as “population transfer” or even directly acknowledge it’s existence. The need for the socialist elite to destroy social bonds and weaken us as a people had to be achieved through another, less conspicuous, method of population transfer - that of forced migration.

Mass immigration is a weapon, a weapon used to implement a subversive policy of forced migration. The effect of mass immigration is evident to all but the most stupid and obsessively single-minded person; it is incredibly unsustainable – environmentally, socially and economically, it reduces the availability of local-resources used to support local-people, drives down the quality of life, increases poverty and forces the existing population, if they are able and fortunate enough, to migrate away in search of their own people or in search of work when the local labor market becomes saturated.

The government know this, they acknowledge the effects and they acknowledge the problems, but they simply will not stop because mass immigration is their most effective weapon in the battle to destroy the ancient social bonds that have helped protect generations of our people from control, tyranny and slavery.

Whilst mass migration is a weapon, many of the migrants themselves are being used as human shields. They are deployed strategically, wheeled out in front of the media when necessary to be portrayed as victims who can only be saved from the evils of right wing common sense by the courageous, caring and dashingly diverse Labour Party. This helps to protect the government from being attacked on their policies ....hence a “human shield”.

The enemy is not the human shield itself, the enemy are the cowards who hide behind the shield, use these people and benefit from their situation, a situation which in many cases has been caused directly or indirectly by the policies of the very same bunch of governing cowards. They created their very own human shield.

And these cowards, criminals and traitors in government that have committed crimes against their own people and have conspired to destroy our nation ....we really will have to hang them won’t we.

You will NEVER break the BNP

I have been more out than in the last few days and have therefore not had the time to post much about the Question Time fiasco with it’s totally un-Democratic and anti-British attack on our Party Chairman and ELECTED MEP Nick Griffin.

David Dimbleby disgraced himself by not exercising the impartiality which he was SUPPOSED to adhere to, by making scurrilous and defamatory statements. Jack Straw showed his real colours ( a bright red communist) and that of his father ( a cowardly yellow ‘conscientious objector’ who spent WW2 languishing in prison while TRUE BRITS DIED ) There was ‘Baroness’ Warsi the conservative Muslim Peer, employing her own brand of Taqiyya
( Say one thing but hide the real meaning, anything goes as long as it gets results ) Well, at least she had a go at Jack ‘man of’ Straw.

I cannot remember the Lib-Dhimmi ’s name, but he was true to type, full of contradictions and spin. And there was also Bonnie Greer, who insisted that we all came from Africa initially ( an unproven, pseudo-scientific, populist  Cultural -Marxist theory, usually quoted to back up the absurd claim that race is an ‘artificial construct’ )

The audience was chock full of lefty students, with only a few right wingers and BNP supporters allowed. it also contained an unrepresentative proportion of ethnic minorities, some of whom had an axe to grind.

The whole debacle dissolved into childish name calling and worn out rhetoric.

The only person to come out with a clean slate was Nick Griffin MEP. nick did not rise to their baited insults and mis-quotes and remained calm and pleasant throughout.
WELL DONE NICK!

I would love to see Nick have a one to one debate with any one of that biased BBC loving panel. He would wipe the floor with them all.

BNP BAITERS BEWARE!

Hat tip for this one goes to New Reporter on the new Green Arrow website

 

This is a unofficial response by SperoPatria to the BBC, the political elite, and the mainstream media who have tried everything in their power to smear Nick Griffin and the British National Party over the last week. The Question Time audience was vastly biased, obviously filled with a few stooges I expect, and so pathetic also that all they spent for one hour was hurling misquoted quotes at Mr Griffin.

Yes the man has a past and is not perfect like any politician, but you did not address real issues that most concern the British people, and you are still happy to refuse the English, Irish, Scots, and Welsh an identity, now that is 'Racism'. You only make us stronger, thank you. The reason for the 'immature' start of the video about the Mainstream media is purely against those in there that deserve a good dig by Nationalists after the lies they spread
The British National Party believes in telling the truth, even if it is sometimes uncomfortable to hear or offensive to those who would rather bury their heads in the sand than face real problems in our society. But while we often pass quite critical comment on the impact of immigration, multi-culturalism and alien religions on the indigenous people of our lands, we have no animosity towards immigrants, their descendants or the followers of non-native religions. Nor do we intend to encourage others to feel such animosity, or believe that anything we have to say is likely to 'stir up hatred' against anyone.

In fact, we believe that by providing a peaceful and Constitutional outlet for the anger and the frustration felt by millions of our people over the undemocratic transformation of our country by our political masters, the BNP actually defuses tensions. Where there is 'hate' we seek to turn it into righteous anger and political action against the only people who deserve to be hated - the politicians who use our taxes to turn our country into a place where we often feel like strangers in our own land.

More links on this subject:-

BBC website ‘Have Your Say’ (some excellent comments there)

Wishful thinking on the part of the Establishment By Green Arrow

Griffin on Question Time; A Critique. By British Nationalist

Jack Straw and Mugabe. Not Griffin. By Lee John Barnes + much more on the subject.

BNP Main Site Question time- Chairman’s Address Well put Nick!

Yet more lies from the slimy Sunday Express

Nobody Likes a Bully by Simon Darby

‘To help socially engineer a multicultural society’- Another good post about multiculturalism from Simon Darby

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE: BUT IT IS NOT TO BE FOUND IN THE STATE CONTROLLED MEDIA!

And in case you missed it on Green Arrow’s site………………

Have you joined the Boycott the press face book Group yet?

Parents seek £1m for hammer attack on white son at 'race bullies' school

Last updated at 2:05 AM on 21st October 2009

 

Damages: Henry Webster was left fighting for life after the attack at his school in 2007

 

A white pupil was battered with a hammer at a school where politically correct teachers were afraid to deal with racial tensions, the High Court heard yesterday.

Henry Webster, 15, suffered a fractured skull and brain damage after being set upon by a gang of Asian youths.

Twelve people were jailed over the 2007 attack, but Mr Webster's parents have now brought a civil action against Ridgeway Foundation School near Swindon.

They claim there was a negligent failure to maintain proper discipline and deal with racial tension and are seeking compensation of up to £1million.

The family's lawyers told the court a 'culture of racist bullying and harassment' built up around a 30-strong gang called the 'Asian Invasion'.

Teachers were too anxious about being seen as bigoted to intervene, but white pupils were branded 'racist' by the acting headmaster and given harsher punishments.

Robert Glancey, QC, representing the family, said tensions escalated after the July 7 London bombings in 2005 and when more Asian pupils joined the school, some of whom were 'radicalised and hostile'.

Racial intimidation and violence became a 'feature of the life of the school' with eruptions of 'extreme acts of violence', it was alleged.

Asians were 'encouraged' to separate from white pupils and formed a gang that would laugh at and abuse them.

Serious incidents included a riot on the playing field in May 2006, which led to armed police attending the school.

At the same time, white pupils received unfair treatment, the court was told. One boy was disciplined for wearing an England shirt.

Court battle: (l-r) Elizabeth Webster with Henry, his brother Joe and his stepfather Roger Durnford outside the High Court in London

Mr Glancey said: 'There were a large number of incidents, events, complaints and warnings which would or should have made any school which was being reasonably competent realise there was a serious problem with racism, violence security, discipline and misbehaviour.'

Mr Webster was attacked after being told an Asian youth wanted a one-to-one fight. But reinforcements from outside the school were called in by mobile phone.

Ridgeway School disputes the allegations against it and says blaming it for the attack, carried out by a non-pupil outside school hours, is ' unprecedented and far-fetched'.

The case is being brought by Mr Webster, now 18, his mother Elizabeth Walker, 46, who has her own nanny recruitment business, his younger brother Joseph, 14, and his step-father Roger Durnford, 44, who runs a building company.

They are also seeking damages, saying they were traumatised by witnessing his injuries and his suffering.

The case continues.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1221759/Hammer-attack-victim-seeks-1m-damages-politically-correct-school-closed-eyes-racial-tensions-Henry-Webster-Asian-Invasion-Swindon-Ridgeway-Foundation.html#ixzz0UY3zC3xW

Exposing Extremism

Something that we Nationalists never tire of doing!

I have been out all day and have just read this excellent post from CLLR Martyn Findlay’s blog

I came across the video below on the Nationalist blog Epping Forest Residents who are using it as a reason to oppose a ‘place of worship’ which their councillors are campaigning against.

 

I am using it for a slightly different reason.

It has often been the excuse used by the media journalists and their Socialist-Marxist friends on the left of British politics that they are combating right wing extremism by refusing the British National Party a platform within their media outlets.

This is pure bullshit of course.  In truth what they have been doing is vilifying political opponents for the purpose of excluding the British National Party from the public realm so that our policies and ideas could not be seen by the public.  The intention was that the only real alternative to the Lib/Lab/Con political tricksters would remain unknown to the public.

As the video above clearly demonstrates.  The best way to combat extremism is to inform the people as to the threat within.

The left wing journalists and Socialist-Marxist cranks are going into overdrive with Nick Griffins appearance on question time coming ever nearer.  They are in no doubt what so ever that rather than combating extremism they are shitting themselves that the chairman of the British National Party is going to sit on the question time panel and be allowed to answer questions.  Even a biased and hand picked audience will not be able to mask the insight and intelligence of the Nationalist position on whatever topics are brought up.

Political correctness – Read this and weep!

The Uncomfortable Definition of an Infidel.... By TITVS ADVXAS

 

I received this message from a friend of a friend...

The Uncomfortable Definition of an Infidel....

Allah or Jesus Christ? Islam is the fastest growing religion in the UK .
Last month I attended my annual training session for maintaining my security clearance in the prison service.
There was a presentation by three speakers from the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Muslim faiths, who explained their beliefs.
I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say about the basics of Islam, complete with video.
After the presentations, question time, I directed my question to the Imam and asked: 'Correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a Holy War against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an infidel?'
There was no disagreement with my statement and, without hesitation, he replied, 'Non-believers!'
I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not a follower of Allah, so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?'
The expression on his face changed from one of authority to that of 'a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the biscuit tin.'
He sheepishly replied, 'Yes.'
I then stated, 'Well, I have a real problem trying to imagine Pope Benedict commanding all Catholics to kill Muslims, or the Archbishop of Canterbury ordering all Protestants to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in heaven!'
The Imam was speechless!
I continued, 'I also have a problem with being your 'friend' when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me!'
'Let me ask you a question. Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me in order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because He will take me to heaven and He wants you to be there with me?'
You could have heard a pin drop as the Imam remained speechless.
Needless to say, the organizers of the Diversification' seminar were not happy with this way of exposing the truth about the Muslims' beliefs.
Within twenty years, ie. 2029, there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.K. to elect a government of their choice, complete with Sharia law
Everyone in the U.K. should be required to read this, but with the current political paralysis, tolerant justice system, liberal media and p.c. madness, there is no way this will be widely publicised.

©TITVS-ADVXAS X-X-MMIX
As Published

POLICE HAVE BECOME A POLITICALLY CORRECT INCOMPETENT MESS

How long will it be before Swindon Police join the bandwagon?

VICTIMS: No-one stepped in to help Fiona Pilkington and Francesca, left

Thursday September 24,2009

By Leo McKinstry

THE warped values of the modern police are a graphic indicator of Britain’s decline.

We once had the finest force in the world, a bulwark of civilisation that protected society and punished criminality but that sense of moral purpose has evaporated.
Today’s police do not regard the maintenance of order as their central duty. Obsessed with social engineering and cultural diversity, they no longer know whose side they are on.

 
Too many police chiefs see their constabularies as the shock troops of New Labour, promo ting Marxist orthodoxies rather than fighting crime.
The results of this change have been disastrous. Violent crime is at record levels. Assault, fraud, burglary and gang warfare are all rife.
While officers play their political games or become swamped by their useless bureaucracy, the very people who rely most on the police for protection are left prey to the thugs.
The police’s indifference to the vulnerable has been high  lighted by the tragic case of Fiona Pilkington, the Leicester shire mother who killed herself and her severely disabled daughter Francesca after being subjected to a campaign of violent harassment by a gang of yob's involving beatings,  vandalism and verbal abuse.
Despite 33 increasingly desperate calls for help from Ms Pilkington and her family Leicestershire police did  nothing to tackle the yobs.
Not a single member of the 16 ­strong gang was ever  prosecuted, nor was a so-­called “exclusion zone” around the home ever enforced.
The disgraceful handling of Ms Pilkington’s case exposes the police’s hollowness of all their shrill rhetoric about “zero tolerance” towards hate crime, for this lethal campaign of intimidation was motivated solely by vicious spite.

 

Leicestershire’s Assistant Chief Constable Chris Tew tried to defend his force’s inaction by resorting to the two classic stratagems so often adopted by public sector organisations in crisis.
First, he hid behind procedural change, claiming that 2,000 of his officers “are now trained to spot vulnerable victims of crime”.
But his words only reveal how completely the police have lost their way. Years ago it would have been an automatic reflex for officers to come vigorously to Ms Pilkington’s aid by taking on the yobs. They would have laughed at the idea they required special training.
The Leicestershire police’s other manoeuvre was the inevitable bleat about “lack of resources”. Now this really is nonsense. Today’s police force is larger, better equipped, more highly rewarded and better funded than at any time in
British history.
Since 1997 the number of officers has gone up from 125,800 to 143,770, while the overall size of the workforce,
including civilian staff and community support  officers, has increased by 56,000. The problem is that all this extra recruitment and money has been squandered through twisted priorities driven by Left­ wing politics rather than the real needs of society.

Two cases, one involving a genuine crime, the other an alleged “thought crime”, illustrate this point. A friend, who runs a successful motor business, had been the victim of a serious credit card fraud, perpetrated by a gang based in Manchester.

Having got away with the fraud once, the gang decided to try their luck again, attempting to buy goods from my friend with another false credit card. But this time he was ready. He told the gang that they would have to pick up the goods in person in the Southeast rather than having them shipped to the North west.
The trap appeared to have been set. My friend rang the police, gave them all the details and explained that it would be simple to arrest the fraudsters on his premises while they were attempting to commit their crime.
To his astonishment the police were not interested. “Lack of resources,” was yet again the excuse. so the gang were not caught as they easily could have been if the police had not been so enfeebled.

 
Yet the police seem to have plenty of resources to seize Ben and Sharon Vogelenzang, a Christian couple who run a hotel in Liverpool. After an argument about their faith with a Muslim guest they were arrested a couple of months later and charged with “reli­giously aggravated behaviour” under the Public Order Act.
Accused of Islamophobia, the couple now face ruin. This Government has long been contemptuous of free speech. Ministers appear eager to side with Muslim grievance­ mongers. They are instinctively  hostile towards Christianity.

Their political correctness has influenced the pattern of  modern policing.

FORTY per cent of  victims of crime are never  visited by the police, yet there were more than 50 officers
available to arrest Tory spokes­ man  Damien Green last year for  daring to question Labour’s immigration policies.

Detection rates for violent crime are at their lowest ever level, reaching just 47 per cent, yet the West Midlands police wasted its time seeking the prosecution of Channel Four
TV producers for highlighting hate preachers in Birming­ham’s mosques.
The police force is now built in New Labour’s image: a huge, mismanaged bureaucracy that grievously fails to deliver what the public pay for; protection against crime.

 
Dixon of Dock Green has been replaced by the shrill politically correct officer.

Well, rather than lose my life to a gang of thugs while the police take hours to arrive, I will use everything at my disposal to protect myself. It is my fundamental human right to do so!

EHRC move against BNP is “State’s Biggest Own Goal”

Arthur Kemp addresses around 150 Defenders of the British People at Merton and Wandsworth branch meeting.

BBC Licensing Harassment in Swindon. Don't Let them in!

I have only just this moment had a visit from  BBC Licensing, trying to gain access to my home.

I told him quite literally to bugger off !

I have not actually watched a TV for about 4 years- but I carried on paying for a licence by direct debit , thinking that because I had a computer that I was still liable for costs.

WRONG.

There is no legal requirement to pay a TV licence. Just DONT sign anything and DONT let them onto your property!

As I told the snivelling little git at my door "I don't watch TV because they tell lies!"

BIG COMMUNIST LIES FOR THE GOVERNMENT AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER!

He tried to catch me by saying "We have people with handsets patrolling the area"

LIES!

They cannot tell the difference between a computer and a TV, no matter what lies they spin.

Here is the TRUTH-------

Bribery, Corruption and Fraud at the BBC - Stop paying your TV Licence fee NOW!

Click on the above picture and KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!

Basically if you are PAYING for a TV LICENSE from this PRIVATE COMPANY you are being DECEIVED and if you REFUSE to PAY they will use a STATEMENT (CONTRACT) so you can PUNISH yourself by your own ACTions. Without DECEIVING you into this, there is nothing they can do and this is quite EVIDENT by their own DOCUMENTATION. Pleas click the image above for more information.

Join this campaign today and let the Government know you will not tolerate their blatant use of our money to publish and broadcast their propaganda, lies and corruption.

Treason has been committed and is still being perpetrated on a daily basis, and you by paying this tax are allowing this to happen.

Join us at The Peoples United Community and say no to the TV Licence Fee and no to Treason!

Enough said I think!

English Schoolgirls Fast for Mohammed in Manchester

From TITVUS ADVXVS

I am all for communities understanding each other's backgrounds and religions, but this Islamification process is not reciprocal . The Muslims are not required to learn about Christianity, Judaism or any other faith for that matter. Ask yourselves why?

Taken from The BNP website, this article is about Manchester (England's 3rd city), and concerns are that with a higher immigrant population, that our school children, in my city the second city, are being forced to follow the same thing that these poor Mancunians had to endure.

Manchester seems at present to have the dubious honour of leading the whole country into the abyss of Islamification.
A week after Manchester BNP activists first exposed the systematic desecration of Christian gravestones at Quadria Jilania Islamic Centre (formerly St John’s Church), only two miles away in the district of Whalley Range, another terrible chapter is being written in the chronicle of our national degradation.

Non-Muslim girls at Whalley Range High School for Girls have been pressured into observing Ramadan by fasting from dawn to dusk. According to the Manchester Evening News, around 30 non-Muslim pupils took part. They had to wake up to have breakfast by 5.00am and were not allowed to eat or drink until 7.30pm.

This unprecedented outrage took place on the 27th day of Ramadan, significant for Muslims as they believe it marks the day when the Koran was revealed to their “prophet” Mohammed and is considered the most important day of the fasting month.

Tellingly, teachers also participated in the charade and all students and staff wore a ‘27’ badge and will apparently be “awarded a certificate” for their self-abasement.

Deputy head teacher Bob Berry said, “It’s a way for the people involved to take on a Muslim way of life for one day and for them to find out a lot from each other. There were whole teaching departments including the teachers who took part, it was a fantastic project, and a great success.”

There are many complex reasons why Manchester seems to be at the forefront of this national malaise. One is certainly the pernicious influence of the virulently anti-British local Labour mafia who have a vice-like death grip on the politics of the corrupt City council and will not rest until every last vestige of British culture has been extirpated from the City. Another factor is the moral turpitude of local Christian ‘leaders’ who noisily make common cause with marauding gangs of violent Labour-UAF thugs in attacking the BNP, but are quiet as church mice when Christian gravestones are being systematically desecrated in the grounds of a converted mosque.

The apologists for Islamification usually seek to justify such obscenities as the Whalley Range Ramadan Islamopandering by citing “cross-cultural understanding”, “community cohesion” or some such vacuous platitude. The problem is that their appeasement agenda always seems to require British culture to cede more and more ground to Imperial Islam, with no reciprocation whatsoever.

Of course we may be wrong. Perhaps Muslim pupils at Whalley Range School for Girls intend to prove their commitment to “cross cultural understanding” and “community cohesion” by sitting down with their British classmates at the end of the Ramadan fast to enjoy a traditional English breakfast of bacon, sausage, egg and Manchester black pudding. Or maybe not.

Has your child been forced or pressured to fast in the name of Islam? If so, please contact the British National Party for support and advice. Email BNP Enquiries or telephone the main helpdesk 02070 783286.
titvs advxas